ADDENDUM TO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:				DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-1990-02453-4
      
   						COUNSEL:  NONE
					
						HEARING DESIRED:  NO

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

His under other than honorable conditions discharge be upgraded 
to honorable.

________________________________________________________________

RESUME OF CASE:

On 31 May 1985, the Board considered and denied the applicant’s 
request to upgrade his bad conduct discharge to honorable.  For 
an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the 
applicant’s request; and, the rationale of the earlier decision 
by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings (ROP) at Exhibit E.  

On 8 May 2006, 12 August 2011 and 13 September 2011, the 
applicant was notified that his requests for reconsideration 
were not favorably considered as he failed to submit new and 
relevant evidence.

On 15 November 2011, the applicant submitted another request for 
reconsideration. In support of his request, he submits a 
personal statement with several signatures and several letters 
of support.  

In support of his appeal, the applicant provides copies of 
letters of support with a petition list.
 
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit F.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

In earlier findings, the Board determined that there was 
insufficient evidence to warrant any corrective action.  After 
thoroughly reviewing the additional documentation submitted in 
support of the appeal and the evidence of record, we do not 
believe the applicant has overcome the rationale expressed in 
the previous decision.  We note the applicant’s contentions are 
essentially the same as stated in the original request.  The 
purported new evidence does not convince the Board that his 
discharge should be upgraded to honorable.  Therefore, in view 
of the above, and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we 
find no basis upon which to recommend favorable consideration of 
the applicant’s request.  

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-1990-02453 in Executive Session on 30 August 2012, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

		, Panel Chair
      		, Member
		, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit F.  Record Of Proceedings, dtd 2 Jan 92, w/Exhibits
                A through D.
    Exhibit F.  Applicant’s letter, dated 15 Nov 11, w/atchs.




								
								Panel Chair